Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Hold That Writ

We pretty much figured out the editorial quality of right wing standard bearer, El Mundo, ten years ago when they published a back page item in which the writer, apparently chagrined over some perceived insult by an American official, referred to the United States as 'a country created by drunken Irishmen'. We, nonetheless, still occasionally consult the pages of what is often touted as the only domestic newspaper that undertakes investigative journalism. This is more a commentary on the rest than a feather in PJ's cap, by the way. El Mundo can only fairly be described as the brainchild of a secret tryst involving Cardinal Ratzinger, Ana Botella and Ambrose Evans-Pritchard.

Yesterday, under the typically dubious headline 'Mortgage defaults* double in one year' we find that the Spanish Mortgage Association has reported that said default rate had risen, year-on-year through September, from 1.84% to 3.04%. That this 65% rise is 'double' implies that the writer would accept 35% as 'unchanged' is secondary. More interesting by far is this third quarter report on defaults from said trade group, known as the AHE in Spanish.

Suffering, as does the item, from a serious lack of definition of terms, a table on page 3 nonetheless tells us that the default plus probable default rate for home mortgages through September stood at 2.99% (El Mundo in its attempt to squeeze blood from a stone quoted the insignificantly higher rate of off-mortgage credits associated with buying a house - co-signed by the parents, and the like - to get it over 3% so that they could call it 'double').

Notwithstanding that this rate did more than duplicate itself from June 2008 to one year later (since rising a statistically irrelevant 0.02%, as an aside), this figure falls far short of the end-of-the-world scenario predicted by the great bulk of uninformed commentators (being the great bulk of commentators, if the reader hadn't noticed). We believe that our prior insistences that falling values, and even a nominally collapsed national economy, would not bring floods of individually foreclosed homes onto the market at any price is being borne out.

Mortgage lending now dismissed as a threat, what have been disastrous for financial institutions are the loans they made further up the real estate food chain. The last two tables of the report show that credit extended to promotors and builders is doubtful to the tune of more than 8 percent in both cases.

The tables also do us the favour of showing which type of institutions are most affected. Except for the negligibly important category of 'loans for home renovations', the cajas de ahorros - comprising about half of the Spanish banking industry - are holding (at times considerably) more garbage than the banks. Combine this with their dominant position in coastal areas - where the prospects of actually selling a home are, ummm, limited - and one would love to be able to put on a bank-caja spread. And hold it for about a decade.

With their default rate of 1.81%, the big winners in the risk control game are the holders of 10 percent of the mortgage market. The cajas rurales, which are the bulk of what the AHE calls 'cooperative banks', are the provincially-amalgamated descendants of the mini-banking operations of individual agricultural co-ops. Their main business was originally to lend money against crops. Being perpetually sleepy and slow-moving sure looks like a good long term plan, does the reader not agree?

*Note also that El Mundo describes as 'morosidad' ('default' in Spanish) for what the report terms 'dudosidad'. This means 'doubtful' and certainly includes mortgages in arrears but not to the point of permitting foreclosure.

-------------------------------

8 Comments:

bsanchez said...

CB,

I don't know why I keep reading you when you are so cruel to some of my favourite mass media (:)). And where does your Ambrosian obsession come from? Have you lived in the UK before?

Anyway, Ambrose is at it again, spinning Japan's numbers out of control. I have never been to Japan or worked on anything related to Japan, but I just notice that if you go to the IMF's figures they show an estiamte for Japan's GROSS public debt and another one for their NET debt. It would appear they have some big Social Security Fund or the like stashed away that needs to be netted off against the famous 200%+ of GDP figure. Ambrose of course chooses to ignore this.

Qué quieres que te diga. El mundo sería mucho más aburrido sin los Ambroses of the world.

Charles Butler said...

Actually, Ambrose has lost some of his luster for me. When he got around to picking up on Spain's housing stock he took a look at the same report that Mr. Hugh used to come up with 3 million unsold homes - and he couldn't find them!

Edward rules!

Cheers. Do drop in again.

Chistopher said...

Whether mortgage foreclosures are just below or above 3%, it's clear that it isn't apocalypse now but what about the future?

Couldn't it be that the millions who have lost their jobs in the last 2 years have been able to meet their repayments thanks to unemployment benefits and severance payments? Then you have to work in an average saving of around 4,000€ on mortgage repayments thanks to Euribor slump. It will be interesting to see how this shapes up when people start running out of money and interest rates rise.

As for El Mundo, they've been a bit sloppy, but how lucky the government is in general not to have a far more critical and hostile press.

Charles Butler said...

Chris,

You might be right, but I'm more inclined to think that the bulk of the unemployed came from people that weren't eligible for a mortgage in the first place - the temporary contract lot. The number of people with full-time contracts now is at 97% of maxima for the series. Temporary is 71%.

That's 1.6 million temporeros less from 2006 to this fall versus 300,000 fewer full-time.

Until the world stops converting government liquidity into savings and starts spending, you'll be hard pressed to convince me of meaningful interest rates on the horizon.

Thanks

santcugat said...

If there's a danger, I don't think it's going to come from private residential mortgages. Worst case, the bank just buys back the property for whatever the outstanding balance was, and sticks it back onto its balance sheet as an asset. Problem solved.

If they need to unload, banks here in Catalunya have been doing clever tricks like selling with loans that guarantee that the house will not go down in value. That way, the bank gets their interest payments and the owner feels better about not paying rent.

Charles Butler said...

How do you make a claim against that promise?

santcugat said...

I think it's along the lines of if the bank sells any of the units (within some time period) for less than you paid, you get refunded the difference.

I'm sure the lawyers drafted that to make it look as good as possible, while making it pretty much impossible collect. Or maybe I'm just cynical.

They also offer a 100% LTV mortgage to sweeten the deal.

Charles Butler said...

God! I can see it now. They'll overstate the sale price on the deed and pay the buyer the difference in cash.

Anti-matter black money.