Despite the obvious hidden cost of later being forced yet again to shave the palm of our right hand, Mr. Sánchez' comment to our last post that perhaps house sales in Spain were continuing to fall precipitously has us thinking - and not just about exactly how we are going to defend our assessment that the line was on the verge of flattening out, evidence notwithstanding. But first we must deal with The Law of the Many Zeros.Judging by the frequency with which the number appears, it seems to have been widely accepted that there are one million (1,000,000) unsold new homes in Spain. And if one is to believe this blog entry - dated December 25, 2008 - and this - published September 14th last - this figure has now passed from the realm of the considered estimate to that of the universal constant. Such is the near-Einsteinian attractiveness of a number that is not a zero followed by a long string of those that are. The dark matter binding Spanish real estate to its fate of eternal entropy.
The power of Many Zeros is sufficient to utterly negate the fact that 187,387 new homes were sold in the above period, work was started on approximately none and huge numbers of works-in-progress were abandonned for lack of funding or market. This is because when a pundit tacks a huge line of zeros behind another number, the uncritical and desperate-for-truth everyman cuts the commentator a tremendous amount of slack when it comes time to render accounts. As an approximation, one might consider what is our guess as to this effect.
1). An estimate of 1,000,000 (six zeros) will be considered to have been correct if the 'truth' turns out to be anywhere between 800,000 and 1,200,000;
2). Another of, say, 900,000 will likely only get the benefit of the doubt if the value turns out to be 100,000 above or below;
3). However, if some fool were to go out and actually count the number of unsold new homes and come up with 943,627, the rabid masses will have his balls on a platter, hang a dead cat from his lintel and pelt his person with overripe tomatoes whenever he ventures to leave the shelter of his home for a loaf of bread if he misses by anything over 10,000;
4). Estimates, on the other hand, over one million are merely redundant unless one uses the geometric multiplier effect of amplifying the first number. Thus, guesses like Edward Hugh's 3,000,000 will probably be considered to have been accurate if the actual sum turns out be anything over one hundred and three.
Returning to the Random Spaniard's comment, we thought it might be half interesting (at least for Gillette's bottom line) to calculate to what degree current new home sales were managing to decompose Spain's stock of new housing. To this end - on the, we believe reasonable, basis that virtually no new inventory has been added in the last year - we've done a monthly calculation of the number of years it will take to deplete the offer at trailing one year sales volumes for the last twelve months... and we've done it for proposed housing inventories of 1.2 million, 1 million and 800,000 units.
The procedure is as follows:
1). Calculate the rolling 12-month sum of sales for each month;
2). Divide, in month 1, the inventory by the above figure;
3). In month 2 (and ensuing months), subtract prior period monthly sales from previous stock and divide the result by the yearly sales for the current period.
The end result of this is an ongoing approximation of how many years it will take to work, at current levels, the inventory of houses to the impossible and undesirable level of zero. And the surprise is that, for a starting figure of 1 million homes, the resulting number is incredibly stable - ranging between 3.53 and 3.62 years over the stretch. For 1.2 million the number trends slightly upward, rising by 0.18 years to 4.46 from November to October. For 800,000, the figure falls by 0.18 years to 2.67.
Not just a matter of doing our bit to reglue and polish up the warped and tarnished veneer of science once sported by the study of economics, the relative constancy of these results - they keep selling houses and the number of years supply doesn't budge - leads us to believe that Spanish housing is, in fact, a radioactive element. We've called it habitatium and calculated, with the help of 1728.com, the half life for the three versions so far discovered.
Habitatium 1,200,000 - 3.72 years
Habitatium 1,000,000 - 3.04 years
Habitatium 800,000 - 2.36 years
So, 'Woooo!', says the reader. 'At the end of October, 2011 there are still going to a half a million unsold new homes!'. Undeniable yes, but the real question to be asked is 'Where are they going to be?'.
The last time we made note of one these estimates (and admittedly not knowing if the expert was an adherent to the Many Zeros faith), it was stated somewhere that there were 450,000 finished and unsold homes along the Mediterranean coast - Spain in its entirety to many readers from northern Europe as well as Telegraph readers who deny such affiliation.These places, by all accounts, are still unsellable. So, some guess as to how many years supply of new Spanish dwellings not located on the Med (of which there might only be 550,000) might be appropriate. We'll do that.
Arbitrarily assigning 70% of all sales to the 55% of properties that are non-Mediterranean turns a stock of 2.6 years. Raising it to a not entirely unrealistic (given the lack of foreign buyers) 80% lowers this to 2.16 years - product of the lessening of the inventory from 550,000 to 386,000 units over the period.
Half-life? Not applicable because the rate of decay is increasing.
---------------------------------
8 Comments:
It seems that the banks and cajas will end up absorbing most of this stock. The speed at which they can get rid of it will depend on how soon they adapt their prices to the real market situation. As you say, banks are inflating asset values and this is slowing any recovery in the construction sector at the cost of making banks' balance sheets look healthier than they are.
When prices stop falling, or better said when people believe that prices have stopped falling, demand should pick up fast as there has to be a lot of pent-up demand out there.
Saludos, Chris
http://www.libertaddigital.com/economia/los-bancos-y-cajas-acabaran-absorbiendo-todo-el-stock-inmobiliario-1276379128/
Chris,
All very true... and you can be certain that they are all acting in concert to prevent a rapid fall in prices. The fly in the ointment for the banks is the second hand market, however.
No doubt about the pent up demand, but there are still deflationary expectations (or at least a sensation that there is no rush).
Lastly, having Zapatero walk out the door would loosen up some wallets. Otherwise, we have to wait until 2012.
This remains me on reports i-banks used to publish on the tech sector in 98-99 and 00. Mental masturbation to justify ever increasing investment and share prices. It seemed common sense had no place within the new paradigm.
And here we are. After extreme residential investment and never ending household price increases, we still have some people that enjoy mental masturbation and insist on looking for some sort of economic justification that supports either a bottom of our sadness or a recovery in our beloved residential sector. Again, endless discussions on supply (like this one) or demand (even more unrealistic) to try and see some light in the darkness of economic depression. Common sense dictates that years of overinvestment create overcapacity, the more pronounced the investment the higher the overcapacity, and we have enjoyed a lot of overinvestment in our fiesta, by any measure. Common sense also dictates that oversupply means either a reduction in prices or a reduction in quantities if a market is to clear, eco 101 if you prefer. So, there is no other way to get rid of the overcapacity but reducing prices, sorry. Finally, we can all dream again of a never ending and price insensitive demand, we can dream, but we can also look at the unemployment rate and find a little bit of a contradiction in this hope of renewed collective stupidity in search of the magic tulip. Besides supply and demand, in a market that depends on leverage it'd be also wise to look at the availability of this great drug... and again, it does not seem that the financial industry is willing or able to provide, is it?
anyway, good luck.---
Thanks, but the only evidence you have that I'm an optimist is that I don't subscribe to the apocalypse line. He who is not with me is against me, in other words. I've made it abundantly clear on a number of occasions that I believe that things will remain really slow for a long period of time.
I've also made it clear that the banks are shooting themselves in the foot by going into the property business - and that lower prices will be a direct result of their actions because they cannot control the second hand market. In general terms though, I want someone (you, for example) to explain to me how annual sales of 230,000 new homes at a time in which nothing new is being built for resale cannot result in a lessening of the stock. This is simple arithmetic - not ideology, even before you factor in the evident fact that most sales are not taking place on the Mediterranean.
As for your masturbation reference - I believe I directly admitted to that in the first clause of the first sentence.
Your contribution is appreciated, but it would be a lot more gratifying if you dealt with the argument on its own terms rather than drawing a blanket conclusion concerning my motives or deficiencies as an analyst.
The end of the world scenario is amply covered. You don't need another iteration of that.
Brilliant post.
I tend to agree that by focusing too much on the detail of the numbers one might miss the big picture i.e. you do not need much in terms of negative macro for the situation not to unravel very quickly!
I am expecting any day to open the newspaper with a headline from Zapatero predicting how quickly the real-estate recovery will be (I might have actually missed it already). I plan to cut it out, frame it and hang it in the toilet.
Pablo,
I agree with your 'negative macro' sentiment. But I think the greater and more probable risk comes from banks being stuck trying to flog a macro selection of properties. As time goes by, they'll end up being badly overweight stuff on the coast and in Mostoles that they cannot move. This will come at a time when it might be interesting to think about building again in whatever places that certainly will end up short of new housing sooner than later. The banks won't be lending money for it.
Thanks for your kind words.
Thanks for this clever post, and again, location, location and more location.
From the cold north of Iberia, just a question: are the oleve trees in Cazorla snowed?
About twelve years ago I crossed Granada totally shoked, because all the countryside was snowed.
Just one comment for doom-sayers and specially to our “comment-moderator” Edward Hugh:
http://www.leap2020.eu/GEAB-N-40-is-available!-Spring-2010-A-new-tipping-point-of-the-global-systemic-crisis-When-the-slip-knot-around-public_a4093.html
Bla, bla, bla…
Some meat on the opposite way in anglosaxon words, please...
Auskalo
Anon,
GEAB seems to have changed their tune. A year ago, they were an inch away from predicting asteroid strikes. No comment but to say that the EU may feel secure enough about spillover to let them roast on the fire for a while before riding to the rescue.
Snow here to about 600 metres, which is a bit unusual. Normally 800-900 is the lower limit. The A-92 between Guadix and Granada gets closed several times a year. It gets pretty cold there in winter.
You'll find a couple of pictures of Cazorla snow here:
http://ibexsalad.blogspot.com/2007/01/olive-oil-make-that-maple-syrup.html
Post a Comment