European
disUnion...

I've been following with all too keen interest the story of the Russian spy, Alexander Litvinenko, recently microwaved with polonium-210 by person or persons unknown - but various suspects come to mind. Well, who hasn't? For all its horror it holds at least the promise of a new book from John Le Carré and, with that, the return of a more familiar and better world - that of the Cold War. Now why would I make as preposterous a claim as that? Well, I'll leave the answer to fund manager Dr. John P. Hussman. In the
September 10, 2006 edition of his weekly market commentary (highly recommended by this punter, by the way), he recalls a joke from his academic days. It goes, "Why are the disputes in academia so fierce?” The answer – “because the stakes are so low.” In a nutshell - people get real testy with their neighbours when risk disappears from the scene. (And if one thing characterizes current relations among members of European Union, it is testiness.) One look at the list of fifteen "Global Stress Points" compiled by risk advisory firm
Aon Corporation and reported in another of my favourite reads,
Capital Chronicle, places "oil price shock" as number one, followed by "avian flu pandemic". Among the other possible sources of global chaos that apparently stand out in the new world order environment are: "financial collapse in the Philipines" and "sovereign default in Argentina". Always the typical armchair critic, I want to know why they overlooked "repeat of last year's locust plague in central Africa".

Compare this silliness with the scene on October 11, 1960 when Soviet president (for those who missed out on all that) Nikita Khruschev in a propagandistic rage bent over and removed one of his shoes during a United Nations debate and began hammering his desk with its heel to drive home his point that America was an imperialist nation. If you are as impressed by that display as I (and the rest of the world) was at the time, consider the effect of the night two years and nearly two weeks later that the Butler family, including their nearly eleven year old younger son, found itself perched breathlessly on the leading edge of the basement sofa to watch the black-and-white television image of John F. Kennedy at his charismatic best stare down the Russians and their plan to seed Cuba with nuclear weapons. That was risk.
Now draw a straight line to present-day Europe. Back then, the not yet fully formed European club (will it ever be?) was still known as the European Common Market. The second world war still made its presence felt throughout Europe in the form of bombed out buildings and American troops, ships, airplanes and nuclear warheads aimed at Moscow stationed throughout the continent. The possibility that the Soviets, brought at least temporarily to a halt by the display of fire and death staged in Dresden, would continue westward was thought to be ever-present. And the governments and people of western Europe? It was nose to the wheel building some sort of political and economic structure that would prevent a recurrence of those two twentieth century wars and which would provide adequately for their citizens whilst developing an economic mass large enough to avoid eternal dependance on the United States, the grand victor of those conflagrations.
Today, a decade and a half after Gorbachev signed the U.S.S.R.'s death sentence, Russia again finds itself in a position of no small influence in western European affairs thanks to its vast supplies of petroleum and natural gas and the high prices they command. And the EU? Incapable (as in the case of the Iraq war, the problem of illegal immigration, the lack of integration of power grids, the proliferation of impediments to cross-border investment, among a myriad of other issues) of acting in unison to provide a secure future for all its residents. Well, Britain gets its oil from the North Sea, Spain pipes in gas from Algeria, etcetera. It's almost like everyone is hunkering down for the day the deal falls apart. And where do the real beneficiaries of this post-war miracle, the voting public, stand? Following the lead of previously front-line Denmark, the purely symbolic and without discernible effect or utility European constitution was rejected by the French citizenry - thus saving Tony Blair from the embarrassment of even having to call the referendum which was sure to come up negative.

Necessity being the mother of invention, the politicians are now jumping on the anti-Brussels bandwagon. Witness one of the few points in which the French left and right coincide - the European Central Bank. Recently anointed saviour of French socialism, Ségolène Royal,
speaking in Portugal, made it clear that she wants to do away with the political independence of the ECB because its monetary policy is damaging the French economy - as if lowering rates from the vertiginous heights of 3.5% will accomplish for the French economy what it couldn't do for itself when they were nearly half that. It is possible that there's no surprise here, either. Since its first sixteenth century pact with the Ottoman empire France has regularly and predictably been a thorn in the side of grand schemes to integrate Europe (unless hatched domestically, of course).
Coming up in 2007 are negotiations to renew a trade agreement between Russia and the EU, currently stalled by a complaint originating in new associate Poland. Poland? Hello? But that's not surprising, either. From the beginning, the EC has taken a great risk in expanding beyond the borders created following the end of hostilities in 1945. And the gamble is not economic or administrative, but philosophical. The nurturing of this (or any other) pacifist impulse that created the Union, born of and bred by the horrors of modern warfare, was never really one of Moscow's preeminent societal goals. The first signs of this cultural divide showed up when Germany was reunited and the Federal Republic found itself with the task of integrating a society that had not participated at all in western European reconstruction and one that was still plagued by all the racism, prejudice and resentment that had characterized the 1930's in the motherland. Very little had changed on that side of the divide since Potsdam. The same goes for virtually every other former Soviet vassal in one degree or another. They are countries and societies that have never shared the utopian vision that was the impetus behind the EU's formation.

Unfortunately, France also is now finding it convenient to ignore the possibility that the European Union is the institution that has allowed
la patrie to enjoy sixty years without a war with one or another of its neighbours for the first time since neanderthals decorated the walls of their homes with hunting prints in Valon Pont d'Arc.
Save us Vlad. We need you.